https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161585 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a challenge to an assessment order by the Commercial Tax Officer. The Court held that the objections raised by the Tax Officer, except for one, were deemed illegal. It was determined that the omission of the registration date in the C form did not render the purchasing dealer unidentifiable. The inclusion of levelling charges in the form and discrepancies in amounts and dates were also contested successfully by the petitioner. The Court granted relief to the petitioner, accepting the forms and ordering relief as requested, without awarding costs. en-us Thu, 20 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Feb 2014 14:37:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161585 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a challenge to an assessment order by the Commercial Tax Officer. The Court held that the objections raised by the Tax Officer, except for one, were deemed illegal. It was determined that the omission of the registration date in the C form did not render the purchasing dealer unidentifiable. The inclusion of levelling charges in the form and discrepancies in amounts and dates were also contested successfully by the petitioner. The Court granted relief to the petitioner, accepting the forms and ordering relief as requested, without awarding costs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 20 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161585