<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 483 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161561</link>
    <description>A challenge to a demand notice and the resulting assessment proceedings could not be rejected solely on limitation where the legality of the notice went to the foundation of the demand. The Tribunal was required to examine the validity of the notice and the consequential assessment issues on the materials produced by the assessee. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration of those questions, and the certificate proceeding was directed to remain stayed pending disposal of the revisional application. The order under challenge was set aside to the extent necessary so the dispute could be adjudicated on the merits of the foundational notice and its consequences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:18:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 483 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161561</link>
      <description>A challenge to a demand notice and the resulting assessment proceedings could not be rejected solely on limitation where the legality of the notice went to the foundation of the demand. The Tribunal was required to examine the validity of the notice and the consequential assessment issues on the materials produced by the assessee. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration of those questions, and the certificate proceeding was directed to remain stayed pending disposal of the revisional application. The order under challenge was set aside to the extent necessary so the dispute could be adjudicated on the merits of the foundational notice and its consequences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>