<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 582 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161553</link>
    <description>Tax payable at the compounded rate under section 7(1)(a) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act is computed only by reference to tax under that Act. Surcharge levied under the Kerala Surcharge on Taxes Act is an independent levy, even though it is measured with reference to sales tax, and cannot be read into the compounding formula unless the statute expressly includes it. Accordingly, surcharge paid in the preceding year cannot be added while computing compounded tax for dealers in gold or silver ornaments. The interpretation is supported by earlier authority on the same provision, while decisions on the character or validity of surcharge do not expand the scope of the compounding section.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 16:47:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 582 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161553</link>
      <description>Tax payable at the compounded rate under section 7(1)(a) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act is computed only by reference to tax under that Act. Surcharge levied under the Kerala Surcharge on Taxes Act is an independent levy, even though it is measured with reference to sales tax, and cannot be read into the compounding formula unless the statute expressly includes it. Accordingly, surcharge paid in the preceding year cannot be added while computing compounded tax for dealers in gold or silver ornaments. The interpretation is supported by earlier authority on the same provision, while decisions on the character or validity of surcharge do not expand the scope of the compounding section.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>