<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 517 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161537</link>
    <description>An administrative order affecting civil rights cannot stand if made without notice and hearing unless natural justice is expressly excluded. The text states that the Divisional Level Committee lacked power to cancel or amend an eligibility certificate already granted, so its earlier ex parte withdrawal order was vulnerable for want of jurisdiction and breach of natural justice. It further states that the later application was not a second review in substance, but a recall of an ex parte, jurisdictionally defective order after an intervening event. The departmental remedy, if any, lay under the statutory scheme governing eligibility certificates, and the Tribunal&#039;s contrary view was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:49:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 517 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161537</link>
      <description>An administrative order affecting civil rights cannot stand if made without notice and hearing unless natural justice is expressly excluded. The text states that the Divisional Level Committee lacked power to cancel or amend an eligibility certificate already granted, so its earlier ex parte withdrawal order was vulnerable for want of jurisdiction and breach of natural justice. It further states that the later application was not a second review in substance, but a recall of an ex parte, jurisdictionally defective order after an intervening event. The departmental remedy, if any, lay under the statutory scheme governing eligibility certificates, and the Tribunal&#039;s contrary view was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>