<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 835 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161533</link>
    <description>The matter was directed for fresh examination by the Assessing Authority on the questions relating to encashment of the bank guarantee and the assessment proceedings, and the earlier order was treated as withdrawn. If any amount was found payable on reconsideration, only 25 per cent was to be deducted, with the balance refunded to the petitioner. The operative effect was a remand for reconsideration and partial refund relief subject to the reassessed liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:34:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 835 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161533</link>
      <description>The matter was directed for fresh examination by the Assessing Authority on the questions relating to encashment of the bank guarantee and the assessment proceedings, and the earlier order was treated as withdrawn. If any amount was found payable on reconsideration, only 25 per cent was to be deducted, with the balance refunded to the petitioner. The operative effect was a remand for reconsideration and partial refund relief subject to the reassessed liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>