<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 680 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161528</link>
    <description>Diesel engine pumping sets were treated as agricultural implements up to 6 September 1981 because the relevant exclusion initially covered only water pumps and the retrospective amendment did not specifically move pumping sets into the machinery entry. From 7 September 1981, a specific notification brought pumping sets within the machinery classification, changing the tax treatment prospectively. The later Supreme Court decision in the assessee&#039;s own case, which distinguished pumping sets from water pumps, was treated as binding where two equal-strength Supreme Court rulings appear to conflict. The result was agricultural-implement classification for the earlier period and machinery classification thereafter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:17:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 680 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161528</link>
      <description>Diesel engine pumping sets were treated as agricultural implements up to 6 September 1981 because the relevant exclusion initially covered only water pumps and the retrospective amendment did not specifically move pumping sets into the machinery entry. From 7 September 1981, a specific notification brought pumping sets within the machinery classification, changing the tax treatment prospectively. The later Supreme Court decision in the assessee&#039;s own case, which distinguished pumping sets from water pumps, was treated as binding where two equal-strength Supreme Court rulings appear to conflict. The result was agricultural-implement classification for the earlier period and machinery classification thereafter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>