<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 612 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161518</link>
    <description>Pre-recorded audio cassettes purchased from registered dealers after the goods had already suffered tax were treated as second sales, so the turnover could not be taxed again on the assessing authority&#039;s theory that recording made the dealer the first seller. The tribunal held that the assessing authority had to consider the Commissioner&#039;s clarification under section 28-A(3), the invoice evidence, and the prior tax sufferance, and if departing from the clarification, it was required to record reasons. The impugned assessment was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 18:29:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 612 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161518</link>
      <description>Pre-recorded audio cassettes purchased from registered dealers after the goods had already suffered tax were treated as second sales, so the turnover could not be taxed again on the assessing authority&#039;s theory that recording made the dealer the first seller. The tribunal held that the assessing authority had to consider the Commissioner&#039;s clarification under section 28-A(3), the invoice evidence, and the prior tax sufferance, and if departing from the clarification, it was required to record reasons. The impugned assessment was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>