<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 48 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243446</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the removal of defects in one miscellaneous application (No. 83196/13) after the applicant rectified the issues to the tribunal&#039;s satisfaction. In another case (No. 388/12), the appeal was restored despite being dismissed for non-prosecution and defects due to the previous representative&#039;s inaction. The tribunal considered the applicant&#039;s explanations and reinstated the appeal in the interest of justice, noting the lack of awareness about filing procedures. The decision underscores the tribunal&#039;s discretion in addressing procedural errors and upholding justice by recalling orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2014 11:13:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 48 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243446</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the removal of defects in one miscellaneous application (No. 83196/13) after the applicant rectified the issues to the tribunal&#039;s satisfaction. In another case (No. 388/12), the appeal was restored despite being dismissed for non-prosecution and defects due to the previous representative&#039;s inaction. The tribunal considered the applicant&#039;s explanations and reinstated the appeal in the interest of justice, noting the lack of awareness about filing procedures. The decision underscores the tribunal&#039;s discretion in addressing procedural errors and upholding justice by recalling orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>