<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 45 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243443</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) regarding the interpretation of Explanation (baa) under Section 80HHC(4B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court ruled that only 90% of net interest, after allowing a set off of interest paid, can be reduced from profits of business, not 90% of gross receipts. Following the legal precedent established by the Supreme Court in ACG Associated Capsules case, the High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and no costs were awarded in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2014 11:13:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 45 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243443</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) regarding the interpretation of Explanation (baa) under Section 80HHC(4B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court ruled that only 90% of net interest, after allowing a set off of interest paid, can be reduced from profits of business, not 90% of gross receipts. Following the legal precedent established by the Supreme Court in ACG Associated Capsules case, the High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and no costs were awarded in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>