<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 21 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243419</link>
    <description>HC held penalty under s.271(1)(c) cannot be imposed where AO&#039;s addition was mere estimation and guesswork not founded on facts. The court found the assessee&#039;s explanation bona fide and, absent corroborative evidence of concealment or deliberate conduct, the AO failed to prove requisite culpability. As estimated income was substantially reduced by the Tribunal, imposition of penalty was unwarranted. Decision ruled against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 14:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 21 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243419</link>
      <description>HC held penalty under s.271(1)(c) cannot be imposed where AO&#039;s addition was mere estimation and guesswork not founded on facts. The court found the assessee&#039;s explanation bona fide and, absent corroborative evidence of concealment or deliberate conduct, the AO failed to prove requisite culpability. As estimated income was substantially reduced by the Tribunal, imposition of penalty was unwarranted. Decision ruled against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>