<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 16 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243414</link>
    <description>Car MP3 players fall within the tariff entry for MP3 players where their description matches that specific heading. The distinction between car MP3 players and MP3 players does not justify classification under another or residuary category. Consequently, the applicable valuation notification permits only 30% abatement, not the higher abatement claimed, because the goods are covered by the specific MP3 player entry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2014 18:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 16 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243414</link>
      <description>Car MP3 players fall within the tariff entry for MP3 players where their description matches that specific heading. The distinction between car MP3 players and MP3 players does not justify classification under another or residuary category. Consequently, the applicable valuation notification permits only 30% abatement, not the higher abatement claimed, because the goods are covered by the specific MP3 player entry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>