<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1607 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243392</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit 35% of the credit availed on capital goods, amounting to Rs.79 lakhs, within eight weeks. Upon this deposit, the pre-deposit of the remaining dues was waived, and the recovery was stayed pending the appeal. The decision considered the financial hardship claimed by the appellant and the precedent set by a similar case, ensuring fair treatment regarding the complex tax and credit issues related to the construction of the shopping mall.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 12:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1607 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243392</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit 35% of the credit availed on capital goods, amounting to Rs.79 lakhs, within eight weeks. Upon this deposit, the pre-deposit of the remaining dues was waived, and the recovery was stayed pending the appeal. The decision considered the financial hardship claimed by the appellant and the precedent set by a similar case, ensuring fair treatment regarding the complex tax and credit issues related to the construction of the shopping mall.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>