<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1600 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243385</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the transfer of the manufacturing division did not constitute a slump sale under section 2(42C) of the Income Tax Act. Therefore, capital gains tax under section 50B was not applicable. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s grounds related to demerger as they were not pertinent to the issue at hand. The appeal by the Revenue was ultimately dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 21.08.2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1600 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243385</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the transfer of the manufacturing division did not constitute a slump sale under section 2(42C) of the Income Tax Act. Therefore, capital gains tax under section 50B was not applicable. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s grounds related to demerger as they were not pertinent to the issue at hand. The appeal by the Revenue was ultimately dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 21.08.2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>