<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 925 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161505</link>
    <description>Pre-existing statutory exemption orders and certificates issued under the erstwhile Bihar regime continued to operate in Jharkhand after State reorganisation, because the reorganisation law preserved existing laws and extended their territorial application until validly altered, repealed or superseded by competent authority. The later Jharkhand industrial policy and 2002 notifications did not displace the earlier exemption, as they were issued under different provisions and did not expressly revoke or modify the existing relief. A possible inter-State character of the coal purchase also did not defeat the exemption, because Central sales tax treatment was a separate assessment question and could not deny the benefit already granted under the State notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2014 15:12:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 925 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161505</link>
      <description>Pre-existing statutory exemption orders and certificates issued under the erstwhile Bihar regime continued to operate in Jharkhand after State reorganisation, because the reorganisation law preserved existing laws and extended their territorial application until validly altered, repealed or superseded by competent authority. The later Jharkhand industrial policy and 2002 notifications did not displace the earlier exemption, as they were issued under different provisions and did not expressly revoke or modify the existing relief. A possible inter-State character of the coal purchase also did not defeat the exemption, because Central sales tax treatment was a separate assessment question and could not deny the benefit already granted under the State notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>