<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1364 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161490</link>
    <description>The judge found the writ petitions regarding the sale of sandalwood in auction sales to be not maintainable due to the petitioners&#039; failure to challenge the proceedings of the tax authorities. Additionally, the judge determined that the sale of sandalwood was local based on legal precedents and burden of proof requirements. Criticizing the petitioners for abusing the court process by repeatedly raising concluded issues, the judge dismissed the petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:28:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1364 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161490</link>
      <description>The judge found the writ petitions regarding the sale of sandalwood in auction sales to be not maintainable due to the petitioners&#039; failure to challenge the proceedings of the tax authorities. Additionally, the judge determined that the sale of sandalwood was local based on legal precedents and burden of proof requirements. Criticizing the petitioners for abusing the court process by repeatedly raising concluded issues, the judge dismissed the petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>