<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 775 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161487</link>
    <description>Sales made through a registered commission agent were treated as first sales within the State where the agent collected and remitted tax on behalf of the principal, and there was no separate sale by the assessee to the agent. On those facts, the turnover had already suffered tax in the hands of the agent acting for the assessee, so turnover tax was not leviable again on the disputed turnover in the assessee&#039;s hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:56:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 775 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161487</link>
      <description>Sales made through a registered commission agent were treated as first sales within the State where the agent collected and remitted tax on behalf of the principal, and there was no separate sale by the assessee to the agent. On those facts, the turnover had already suffered tax in the hands of the agent acting for the assessee, so turnover tax was not leviable again on the disputed turnover in the assessee&#039;s hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>