<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 1036 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161480</link>
    <description>Dismissal of special leave petitions discharged the Supreme Court&#039;s interim stay, and an earlier direction for expeditious disposal did not keep the revisions stayed thereafter. The challenge to reassessment and assessment notices on limitation and service grounds also failed where the notice was served by affixation and the assessee appeared and filed objections admitting service. For the other years, any defect in notice was treated as a procedural irregularity affecting natural justice, so the assessments were rightly set aside and remanded for fresh consideration. The revisions were therefore dismissed, and the orders directing fresh assessment were left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:54:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 1036 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161480</link>
      <description>Dismissal of special leave petitions discharged the Supreme Court&#039;s interim stay, and an earlier direction for expeditious disposal did not keep the revisions stayed thereafter. The challenge to reassessment and assessment notices on limitation and service grounds also failed where the notice was served by affixation and the assessee appeared and filed objections admitting service. For the other years, any defect in notice was treated as a procedural irregularity affecting natural justice, so the assessments were rightly set aside and remanded for fresh consideration. The revisions were therefore dismissed, and the orders directing fresh assessment were left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>