<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1530 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243315</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of rental income as income from house property, denying depreciation allowance. The issue of double booking of advisory fees was sent back to the AO for verification. Deduction of municipal taxes was to be reconsidered for the relevant assessment year. Disallowance under Section 14A was restricted to 1% of administrative expenses. The deletion of disallowed interest expenditure was upheld. The allowance of write-off of bad debts was confirmed as a business loss. The reduction of total income by principal recovery portion of lease rentals was to be reexamined. The appeal outcome was a partial allowance for both parties, with specific issues to be reviewed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1530 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243315</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of rental income as income from house property, denying depreciation allowance. The issue of double booking of advisory fees was sent back to the AO for verification. Deduction of municipal taxes was to be reconsidered for the relevant assessment year. Disallowance under Section 14A was restricted to 1% of administrative expenses. The deletion of disallowed interest expenditure was upheld. The allowance of write-off of bad debts was confirmed as a business loss. The reduction of total income by principal recovery portion of lease rentals was to be reexamined. The appeal outcome was a partial allowance for both parties, with specific issues to be reviewed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>