<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 906 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161446</link>
    <description>An assessee who opts for compounding under section 7(7A) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 cannot also claim the reduced SSI rate under S.R.O. No. 1728 of 1993, because that concession applies only where the taxable turnover of manufactured goods can be identified and bifurcated after regular assessment; the compounding scheme taxes the works contract turnover as a whole, so the concession was denied and the demand sustained. An order refusing revision against a demand of penal interest was also unsustainable because such a demand is revisable on merits; the refusal was set aside and the revision was restored for fresh consideration after notice and hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:46:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 906 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161446</link>
      <description>An assessee who opts for compounding under section 7(7A) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 cannot also claim the reduced SSI rate under S.R.O. No. 1728 of 1993, because that concession applies only where the taxable turnover of manufactured goods can be identified and bifurcated after regular assessment; the compounding scheme taxes the works contract turnover as a whole, so the concession was denied and the demand sustained. An order refusing revision against a demand of penal interest was also unsustainable because such a demand is revisable on merits; the refusal was set aside and the revision was restored for fresh consideration after notice and hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>