<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1362 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161444</link>
    <description>A two-member Trade Tax Tribunal bench must dispose of an appeal as a collective judicial act under the statutory scheme, with the decision reflecting the bench&#039;s majority opinion. Where the members signed and dated the order separately, and one member described himself in a different bench capacity, the order failed to show a single valid decision of the constituted bench. Separate individual expressions of opinion did not satisfy the requirement of a tribunal judgment delivered as one operative decision. The impugned order was therefore invalid and quashed, and the matter was sent back for reconstitution of the bench and fresh decision in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:34:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1362 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161444</link>
      <description>A two-member Trade Tax Tribunal bench must dispose of an appeal as a collective judicial act under the statutory scheme, with the decision reflecting the bench&#039;s majority opinion. Where the members signed and dated the order separately, and one member described himself in a different bench capacity, the order failed to show a single valid decision of the constituted bench. Separate individual expressions of opinion did not satisfy the requirement of a tribunal judgment delivered as one operative decision. The impugned order was therefore invalid and quashed, and the matter was sent back for reconstitution of the bench and fresh decision in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>