https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243299 A revisional order under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act could not stand where the affected dealer was not given a meaningful opportunity of hearing before the order was made. Although time was granted after appearance by the representative, no specific date was fixed for production of records and the authority passed the revisional orders before the time sought for filing material had expired. The court held that this denied natural justice and prevented consideration of relevant records. The revisional orders and consequential demand notices were therefore quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration after giving an effective opportunity to appear and produce documents. en-us Tue, 17 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:21:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243299 A revisional order under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act could not stand where the affected dealer was not given a meaningful opportunity of hearing before the order was made. Although time was granted after appearance by the representative, no specific date was fixed for production of records and the authority passed the revisional orders before the time sought for filing material had expired. The court held that this denied natural justice and prevented consideration of relevant records. The revisional orders and consequential demand notices were therefore quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration after giving an effective opportunity to appear and produce documents. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 17 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243299