<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1513 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243298</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging a mere show cause notice on a Form-C application was premature because the competent authority had not yet taken a final decision on the petitioner&#039;s reply. In the absence of a final rejection, there was no justiciable cause for judicial review under writ jurisdiction, and the petition was not entertained on merits. The matter was remitted to the statutory authority for an expeditious decision on the Form-C request, with reasons to be recorded if the request was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:21:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1513 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243298</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging a mere show cause notice on a Form-C application was premature because the competent authority had not yet taken a final decision on the petitioner&#039;s reply. In the absence of a final rejection, there was no justiciable cause for judicial review under writ jurisdiction, and the petition was not entertained on merits. The matter was remitted to the statutory authority for an expeditious decision on the Form-C request, with reasons to be recorded if the request was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>