<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1489 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243274</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to restore the addition of Rs.20 lakhs, stating that the appellant did not retract the voluntary disclosure made by the Managing Director during assessment. The Court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of admissions unless properly retracted and imposed a cost of Rs.10,000 on the appellant for filing a frivolous appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2014 09:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1489 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243274</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to restore the addition of Rs.20 lakhs, stating that the appellant did not retract the voluntary disclosure made by the Managing Director during assessment. The Court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of admissions unless properly retracted and imposed a cost of Rs.10,000 on the appellant for filing a frivolous appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>