<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1488 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243273</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the addition/disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, citing the retrospective effect of the relevant amendment. Consequently, the challenge to the reassessment proceedings under Section 147 was considered academic, leading to the dismissal of the Tax Appeal due to the absence of any substantial question of law warranting further review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:18:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1488 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243273</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the addition/disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, citing the retrospective effect of the relevant amendment. Consequently, the challenge to the reassessment proceedings under Section 147 was considered academic, leading to the dismissal of the Tax Appeal due to the absence of any substantial question of law warranting further review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>