<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1487 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243272</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions regarding the additions of undisclosed income, emphasizing the importance of factual assessments and supporting evidence in tax matters. The judgment underscores the significance of justifying additions based on concrete evidence to avoid their deletion during appellate proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:18:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=344001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1487 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243272</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions regarding the additions of undisclosed income, emphasizing the importance of factual assessments and supporting evidence in tax matters. The judgment underscores the significance of justifying additions based on concrete evidence to avoid their deletion during appellate proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>