<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1475 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243260</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on inputs purchased through a registered first stage dealer was not to be denied merely because the original manufacturer was later found non-existent. The buyer satisfied Rule 9(3) by receiving goods under apparently genuine invoices, entering them in statutory records, using them in manufacture, clearing final products on duty payment, and paying by cheque. The court noted that reasonable steps are assessed on the facts, and it is impractical to require verification of the dealer&#039;s internal records beyond the documents accompanying the goods. On those facts, bona fide receipt and due diligence were established, so denial of credit was unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 11:09:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1475 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243260</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on inputs purchased through a registered first stage dealer was not to be denied merely because the original manufacturer was later found non-existent. The buyer satisfied Rule 9(3) by receiving goods under apparently genuine invoices, entering them in statutory records, using them in manufacture, clearing final products on duty payment, and paying by cheque. The court noted that reasonable steps are assessed on the facts, and it is impractical to require verification of the dealer&#039;s internal records beyond the documents accompanying the goods. On those facts, bona fide receipt and due diligence were established, so denial of credit was unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>