<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1459 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243244</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the respondent&#039;s applications for correction and clarification, while dismissing the appellants&#039; requests based on new Notifications, citing the limitations of rectification under Section 129B(2) of the Customs Act. The judgment underscored adherence to statutory provisions and the distinction between inherent jurisdiction and statutory powers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 06:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1459 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243244</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the respondent&#039;s applications for correction and clarification, while dismissing the appellants&#039; requests based on new Notifications, citing the limitations of rectification under Section 129B(2) of the Customs Act. The judgment underscored adherence to statutory provisions and the distinction between inherent jurisdiction and statutory powers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>