<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1458 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243243</link>
    <description>Imports from Nepal were examined in relation to exemption notification conditions and the claimed overriding effect of the Indo-Nepal Treaty. The appellate order was challenged on the basis that the Treaty displaced the notification conditions, with reliance placed on a departmental circular and DGFT clarification. The Tribunal noted the principle in Ratan Melting &amp; Wire Industries that binding circulars govern the Department, and found no basis to treat the appellate order as ex facie illegal or without jurisdiction. On that footing, a stay of the order was not warranted and the stay petitions were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 06:36:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1458 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243243</link>
      <description>Imports from Nepal were examined in relation to exemption notification conditions and the claimed overriding effect of the Indo-Nepal Treaty. The appellate order was challenged on the basis that the Treaty displaced the notification conditions, with reliance placed on a departmental circular and DGFT clarification. The Tribunal noted the principle in Ratan Melting &amp; Wire Industries that binding circulars govern the Department, and found no basis to treat the appellate order as ex facie illegal or without jurisdiction. On that footing, a stay of the order was not warranted and the stay petitions were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>