<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1455 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243240</link>
    <description>In a service tax valuation dispute involving Business Auxiliary Services, the Tribunal considered whether reimbursement charges received from the principal formed part of the taxable value and whether interim protection was justified. Relying on the Delhi High Court ruling striking down Rule 5(1) of the Service Tax Valuation Rules, the Tribunal found that the appellant had shown a sufficient prima facie case on the valuation issue. It therefore granted waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery of service tax, interest, and penalty pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 06:36:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1455 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243240</link>
      <description>In a service tax valuation dispute involving Business Auxiliary Services, the Tribunal considered whether reimbursement charges received from the principal formed part of the taxable value and whether interim protection was justified. Relying on the Delhi High Court ruling striking down Rule 5(1) of the Service Tax Valuation Rules, the Tribunal found that the appellant had shown a sufficient prima facie case on the valuation issue. It therefore granted waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery of service tax, interest, and penalty pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>