<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1453 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243238</link>
    <description>The tribunal denied the appellant&#039;s request for a complete waiver of confirmed amounts related to ineligible cenvat credit. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 60,000 within eight weeks, with a stay on recovery of the remaining balance until appeal disposal. The tribunal found that Rule 4(a) of the Service Tax Rules did not exempt the appellant from the service tax liability in this case. The decision emphasized the importance of compliance and partial deposit before considering further waiver requests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 06:36:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1453 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243238</link>
      <description>The tribunal denied the appellant&#039;s request for a complete waiver of confirmed amounts related to ineligible cenvat credit. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 60,000 within eight weeks, with a stay on recovery of the remaining balance until appeal disposal. The tribunal found that Rule 4(a) of the Service Tax Rules did not exempt the appellant from the service tax liability in this case. The decision emphasized the importance of compliance and partial deposit before considering further waiver requests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>