<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1451 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243236</link>
    <description>Road repair work was noted as proposed for retrospective exemption in the Finance Bill, 2012, while construction of parks was observed not to prima facie fall within commercial or industrial construction service. The demand was also considered to appear time-barred. On these grounds, the appellants were found to have a strong prima facie case, and the requirement to pre-deposit service tax and penalties was dispensed with, with recovery stayed during the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 06:35:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1451 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243236</link>
      <description>Road repair work was noted as proposed for retrospective exemption in the Finance Bill, 2012, while construction of parks was observed not to prima facie fall within commercial or industrial construction service. The demand was also considered to appear time-barred. On these grounds, the appellants were found to have a strong prima facie case, and the requirement to pre-deposit service tax and penalties was dispensed with, with recovery stayed during the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>