<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1416 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243201</link>
    <description>Laying irrigation pipelines was treated, on a prima facie basis, as works contract service rather than erection, commissioning or installation service, and the Board circular excluding such activity from taxable service supported that view. On that interim assessment, complete waiver of pre-deposit was justified and recovery remained stayed pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:45:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1416 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243201</link>
      <description>Laying irrigation pipelines was treated, on a prima facie basis, as works contract service rather than erection, commissioning or installation service, and the Board circular excluding such activity from taxable service supported that view. On that interim assessment, complete waiver of pre-deposit was justified and recovery remained stayed pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>