<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1411 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243196</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the interpretation of peak amounts for Assessment Year 2007-08 and acceptance of the peak credit theory by the assessee. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to restrict the addition to peak amounts of Rs.16,93,308 for 2006-07 and Rs.61,742 for 2007-08, emphasizing the importance of the explanation provided by the assessee and the detailed peak credit statement in assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:44:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1411 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243196</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the interpretation of peak amounts for Assessment Year 2007-08 and acceptance of the peak credit theory by the assessee. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to restrict the addition to peak amounts of Rs.16,93,308 for 2006-07 and Rs.61,742 for 2007-08, emphasizing the importance of the explanation provided by the assessee and the detailed peak credit statement in assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>