<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1407 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243192</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing that Investment Allowance is available upon machinery installation, regardless of use. The Tribunal correctly allowed the allowance for machinery in the Milk Division, certified and installed. Verification was ordered for machinery in the Soya Division due to unclear details. The Court dismissed the appeal, stating Investment Allowance cannot be denied post-installation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:44:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1407 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243192</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing that Investment Allowance is available upon machinery installation, regardless of use. The Tribunal correctly allowed the allowance for machinery in the Milk Division, certified and installed. Verification was ordered for machinery in the Soya Division due to unclear details. The Court dismissed the appeal, stating Investment Allowance cannot be denied post-installation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>