https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243178 The Tribunal allowed early hearing of a case involving de-bonding of a 100% EOU due to the significant demand amount and age of the matter. The demand notice for duty payment on capital goods was set aside by the Commissioner (Appeals) as it was issued without proper quantification and during a valid warehousing period. The Tribunal upheld this decision, emphasizing the need for fair quantification and consideration of all relevant factors in duty liability disputes. The Revenue's appeal was rejected, highlighting the importance of proper determination in such matters. en-us Thu, 02 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jan 2014 21:42:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243178 The Tribunal allowed early hearing of a case involving de-bonding of a 100% EOU due to the significant demand amount and age of the matter. The demand notice for duty payment on capital goods was set aside by the Commissioner (Appeals) as it was issued without proper quantification and during a valid warehousing period. The Tribunal upheld this decision, emphasizing the need for fair quantification and consideration of all relevant factors in duty liability disputes. The Revenue's appeal was rejected, highlighting the importance of proper determination in such matters. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 02 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243178