<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Dismisses Appeal for Non-Compliance; Closure and Lack of Funds Not Justified Without Partial Duty Payment Agreement.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=16967</link>
    <description>Tribunal dismissed the appeal for non compliance - appellant&#039;s plea that as the unit has since closed down, the appellant has no funds, could have been relevant if the appellant had agreed to deposit some part of the duty claimed. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2014 20:34:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2014 20:34:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Dismisses Appeal for Non-Compliance; Closure and Lack of Funds Not Justified Without Partial Duty Payment Agreement.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=16967</link>
      <description>Tribunal dismissed the appeal for non compliance - appellant&#039;s plea that as the unit has since closed down, the appellant has no funds, could have been relevant if the appellant had agreed to deposit some part of the duty claimed. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2014 20:34:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=16967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>