https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243164 The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax against the appellant, a construction services provider, amounting to Rs.2,18,44,015/-, along with penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant's argument that the value of steel and cement provided by service receivers should not be included in the service tax calculation was rejected. The Tribunal emphasized the need to consider materials supplied by service receivers for service tax calculation, in line with relevant notifications and legal precedents, requiring the appellant to deposit the remaining service tax amount within six weeks. en-us Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 26 Jan 2014 20:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243164 The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax against the appellant, a construction services provider, amounting to Rs.2,18,44,015/-, along with penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant's argument that the value of steel and cement provided by service receivers should not be included in the service tax calculation was rejected. The Tribunal emphasized the need to consider materials supplied by service receivers for service tax calculation, in line with relevant notifications and legal precedents, requiring the appellant to deposit the remaining service tax amount within six weeks. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243164