https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243132 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, dismissing the writ petition challenging the premature filing of the original application. The Court emphasized the difference in standards of proof between criminal cases and departmental enquiries, noting the petitioner's conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The Court found no manifest error in the Tribunal's judgment, allowing the department to proceed with appropriate action following the show cause notice stage. en-us Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 26 Jan 2014 20:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243132 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, dismissing the writ petition challenging the premature filing of the original application. The Court emphasized the difference in standards of proof between criminal cases and departmental enquiries, noting the petitioner's conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The Court found no manifest error in the Tribunal's judgment, allowing the department to proceed with appropriate action following the show cause notice stage. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243132