<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1344 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243129</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a courier company, in a case involving misdeclaration of imported goods and applicability of a customs notification. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed as the Tribunal found no evidence of misdeclaration, emphasizing adherence to import procedures and cargo classification. The impugned order was set aside, providing consequential relief to the appellant and absolving them of misdeclaration charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2014 20:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1344 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243129</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a courier company, in a case involving misdeclaration of imported goods and applicability of a customs notification. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed as the Tribunal found no evidence of misdeclaration, emphasizing adherence to import procedures and cargo classification. The impugned order was set aside, providing consequential relief to the appellant and absolving them of misdeclaration charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>