https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243127 A writ petition was held maintainable despite an available statutory appeal, because the alternative-remedy objection had already been rejected and could not be reopened. The Court also held that alleged irregularities in an auction sale during pendency of proceedings required adjudication on a complete record, and that the auction purchaser was a necessary party whose impleadment and amendment should have been allowed. The order rejecting review was quashed, the earlier order was reviewed, and the matter was remitted to the Tribunal for fresh decision after amendment and impleadment, with interim protection from dispossession preserved. en-us Thu, 02 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243127 A writ petition was held maintainable despite an available statutory appeal, because the alternative-remedy objection had already been rejected and could not be reopened. The Court also held that alleged irregularities in an auction sale during pendency of proceedings required adjudication on a complete record, and that the auction purchaser was a necessary party whose impleadment and amendment should have been allowed. The order rejecting review was quashed, the earlier order was reviewed, and the matter was remitted to the Tribunal for fresh decision after amendment and impleadment, with interim protection from dispossession preserved. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 02 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243127