https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243124 The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order and ruled in favor of the Commissioner of Central Excise, holding that remission of Central Excise duty could not be justified due to the substantial storage loss of 895 quintals. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to permissible limits for storage loss and concluded that remission of duty was not allowable in cases of significant, undisputed storage loss. en-us Mon, 06 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Aug 2014 17:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243124 The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order and ruled in favor of the Commissioner of Central Excise, holding that remission of Central Excise duty could not be justified due to the substantial storage loss of 895 quintals. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to permissible limits for storage loss and concluded that remission of duty was not allowable in cases of significant, undisputed storage loss. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 06 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243124