<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1331 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243116</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It was determined that the addition made by the Assessing Officer was based on estimates and not indicative of concealed income. The Tribunal emphasized a distinction between inaccurate claims and furnishing inaccurate particulars of income required for penalty imposition. The decision aligned with previous judgments and Supreme Court principles, affirming that penalty proceedings should be separate from assessment proceedings. The department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, supporting the deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 18:20:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1331 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243116</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It was determined that the addition made by the Assessing Officer was based on estimates and not indicative of concealed income. The Tribunal emphasized a distinction between inaccurate claims and furnishing inaccurate particulars of income required for penalty imposition. The decision aligned with previous judgments and Supreme Court principles, affirming that penalty proceedings should be separate from assessment proceedings. The department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, supporting the deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>