<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1290 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243075</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The issue of depreciation on the car was set aside for re-adjudication by the AO, while the disallowance of interest was dismissed. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the AO to consider all facts and circumstances in determining the necessity and usage of the car for business purposes and found no nexus between interest-bearing funds and interest-free advances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 19:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1290 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243075</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The issue of depreciation on the car was set aside for re-adjudication by the AO, while the disallowance of interest was dismissed. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the AO to consider all facts and circumstances in determining the necessity and usage of the car for business purposes and found no nexus between interest-bearing funds and interest-free advances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>