<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1280 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243065</link>
    <description>The Tribunal declared the reopening of the assessment for A.Y. 1995-96 invalid due to the absence of proper sanction from the Commissioner as mandated by Section 151 of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the assessment was deemed void ab initio. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s cross-appeal was dismissed, affirming that the reopening proceedings were legally flawed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1280 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243065</link>
      <description>The Tribunal declared the reopening of the assessment for A.Y. 1995-96 invalid due to the absence of proper sanction from the Commissioner as mandated by Section 151 of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the assessment was deemed void ab initio. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s cross-appeal was dismissed, affirming that the reopening proceedings were legally flawed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>