https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243008 Limitation under FEMA appeals had to be assessed from the actual receipt of the impugned order, and the period bona fide spent pursuing a writ remedy could be excluded. The Court noted that the appellants were entitled to have their condonation applications examined on the merits, and the Appellate Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeals by treating its power to condone delay as confined by the repealed regime. The dismissal on limitation was set aside, and the matter was remanded for consideration of condonation of delay and, if delay is condoned, for decision on the appeals on merits. en-us Thu, 09 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Jan 2014 17:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243008 Limitation under FEMA appeals had to be assessed from the actual receipt of the impugned order, and the period bona fide spent pursuing a writ remedy could be excluded. The Court noted that the appellants were entitled to have their condonation applications examined on the merits, and the Appellate Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeals by treating its power to condone delay as confined by the repealed regime. The dismissal on limitation was set aside, and the matter was remanded for consideration of condonation of delay and, if delay is condoned, for decision on the appeals on merits. Case-Laws FEMA Thu, 09 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243008