<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1222 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243007</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order, ruling that the Revenue failed to prove illegal import or attempt to export the foreign currency. It was found that customs officers lacked jurisdiction under FEMA, and procedural requirements for adjudication were not met. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 15:09:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1222 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243007</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order, ruling that the Revenue failed to prove illegal import or attempt to export the foreign currency. It was found that customs officers lacked jurisdiction under FEMA, and procedural requirements for adjudication were not met. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=243007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>