https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161422 The Supreme Court upheld the lower courts' findings that the adoption of Venkayya was not proven, there was no partition between Pitchayya and Chimpirayya, and the will executed by Chimpirayya did not effect a severance in status. The Court clarified that the scope of appeals under Article 133 allows for a comprehensive review of lower courts' decisions, dismissing the appeal. en-us Tue, 09 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Aug 2014 17:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161422 The Supreme Court upheld the lower courts' findings that the adoption of Venkayya was not proven, there was no partition between Pitchayya and Chimpirayya, and the will executed by Chimpirayya did not effect a severance in status. The Court clarified that the scope of appeals under Article 133 allows for a comprehensive review of lower courts' decisions, dismissing the appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=161422