<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1205 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242990</link>
    <description>Delay in appeals against ex parte assessment orders was held liable to be condoned where the assessee showed genuine confusion about the hearing date, non-communication of the date, and illness, with no deliberate or intentional laches. The court applied the principle that limitation should not defeat substantial justice in such circumstances, and the appeals were therefore required to be heard on merits rather than rejected on limitation alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:56:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1205 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242990</link>
      <description>Delay in appeals against ex parte assessment orders was held liable to be condoned where the assessee showed genuine confusion about the hearing date, non-communication of the date, and illness, with no deliberate or intentional laches. The court applied the principle that limitation should not defeat substantial justice in such circumstances, and the appeals were therefore required to be heard on merits rather than rejected on limitation alone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>