<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1203 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242988</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that long-term leases of immovable property are taxable under the service of &quot;renting of immovable property,&quot; rejecting the appellant&#039;s argument for exclusion. Renting vacant land was not taxable before 1.7.2010, but became taxable after the amendment. The case was remanded for a fresh adjudication on the extended period of limitation and exclusion of certain receipts from gross consideration. The appellant&#039;s lack of cooperation with the Service Tax Department was criticized. The adjudication order was quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication, with the appellant given 30 days to respond.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1203 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242988</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that long-term leases of immovable property are taxable under the service of &quot;renting of immovable property,&quot; rejecting the appellant&#039;s argument for exclusion. Renting vacant land was not taxable before 1.7.2010, but became taxable after the amendment. The case was remanded for a fresh adjudication on the extended period of limitation and exclusion of certain receipts from gross consideration. The appellant&#039;s lack of cooperation with the Service Tax Department was criticized. The adjudication order was quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication, with the appellant given 30 days to respond.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>