<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1201 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242986</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant, a bank, to claim CENVAT credit for Insurance Auxiliary Service as part of employee benefits, granting credit of approximately Rs. 3.45 crores. However, the credit for Real Estate Agent&#039;s Service and Event Management Service was denied as they were not deemed to be directly related to the bank&#039;s business activities. The Tribunal waived pre-deposit of dues and stayed recovery during the appeal process, considering the appellant&#039;s reversal of Rs. 1.62 crore sufficient for the hearing, with the total credit availed for the disputed services amounting to approximately Rs. 1.25 crore.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:56:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1201 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242986</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant, a bank, to claim CENVAT credit for Insurance Auxiliary Service as part of employee benefits, granting credit of approximately Rs. 3.45 crores. However, the credit for Real Estate Agent&#039;s Service and Event Management Service was denied as they were not deemed to be directly related to the bank&#039;s business activities. The Tribunal waived pre-deposit of dues and stayed recovery during the appeal process, considering the appellant&#039;s reversal of Rs. 1.62 crore sufficient for the hearing, with the total credit availed for the disputed services amounting to approximately Rs. 1.25 crore.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>